(Untitled)

Feb 03, 2005 16:54

so moses is a douchebag, so i'm taking an offical vote. cut my hair or not... girls get 1.25 votes. guys get 1. if you need to ask why, you don't deserve to know

in other news
my background is more badass than yours.

Leave a comment

Comments 13

___makeithot February 4 2005, 01:07:15 UTC
I don't know what you're talking about. My background is way more hardcore then yours. Mines F ing 50 Cent. What now??

Reply

savageloquence February 4 2005, 01:32:01 UTC
but mines effing donnie darko.
besides, i get bonus points because my icon is puss in boots

Reply

___makeithot February 7 2005, 00:50:08 UTC
Yeah ok Mark whatever you say. You know that 50 cent is way better. Puss n' boots is pretty bad ass though. So I think that its a tie.

Reply


dasamurai February 4 2005, 01:32:10 UTC
I vote... hmm... yes! make it neato!

Reply


ashle2000 February 4 2005, 01:38:00 UTC
i vote no. i think your hair is cool. RIGHT now. haha. besides, whenever guys get haircuts, it looks funny for a while,

not that you look funny or anything,

but with a haircut you are taking that risk.

hahaha.

Reply


exquisiteorange February 4 2005, 01:48:53 UTC
DON'T CUT IT.. wait a little longer. its a good length right now, but maybe in a month or so it will get TOO long.. and then you can start over. i like it now though.

Reply


karkar425 February 4 2005, 02:06:43 UTC
ok. my vote is complicated. I say cut it a TINY bit, like a trim. So, if there were three catagories in this vote: cut, mini cut, and no cut. My vote would go to mini cut.

But choosing simply between cut and no cut, I would have to choose no cut.

Do with my 1.25 points as you wish!

Reply

sigh savageloquence February 4 2005, 04:21:52 UTC
karli, thats not how this works. you have to choose. c'monnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn..

Reply

Re: sigh karkar425 February 4 2005, 05:05:40 UTC
i said that if i had to choose between cutting and no cutting that i would choose no cutting. so there, i've chosen twice, with the same choice!!!

Reply

Re: sigh savageloquence February 4 2005, 23:31:45 UTC
oh...right...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up