Entertainment Weekly

[aznwonder]

Hmm, has anyone seen the new Entertainment Weekly? They have an article on the new Harry Potter DVD, and this is just a slight observation- but under Starring they have: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson...

Interesting. (FYI, I'm a huge Emma fan.)

Comments

[_occlumency]

I totally don't mean to be rude or anything, but... what exactly is your point? I mean.. did they leave out Rupert? Or.. something? I'm a bit confused.

[aznwonder]

LOL omg I just re-read what I wrote and it totally looks confusing. But okay, since they can't print the whole cast for one review article, they only name the 2 largest roles. They named Emma, instead of Rupert.

Now, I <3 Emma, but shouldn't Ron have a bigger role than Hermione?

[_occlumency]

Ah, ok, I get it now, haha.

Yeah, Ron should have a bigger part than Hermione.. or at least kind of equal. Stupid Entertainment Weekly, leaving out our Rupert... >

[angeleyes699]

Yeah they have a point. Like you sit through the whole movie waiting for the end-ish parts where they get Buckbeak etc - and Hermione's role takes up about half an hour more movie time than Ron's because he's gone and broken his leg.

But in CoS, Hermione is petrified so Ron has to be Harry's escort down into the chamber. Its like a pattern if you think about it. God bless Ron for the comical relief, they should have put him as one of the biggest stars for that alone.