Businesses are run by individuals, therefore, if you make that assumption about businesses the same should apply to people, so I presume we will see some moves to reduce ASBOs etc?
No, actually I think it's more akin to "if you are not yet perceived to have committed an anti-social crime, then carry on because no-one is going to be closely monitoring you" which is kind of how individuals are treated now isn't it?
The difference being that individuals are not driven by share-holders who want to see maximum profit regardless of the (non-financial) cost. To assume that the majority of businesses will behave responsibly and should only be monitored and/or investigated if they are already perceived to be bad guys (and in whose estimation?) strikes me as abject madness.
And the interesting thing is that, in Mr Meacher's opinion, the Reform Bill is designed to usher in the Action Plan. So presumably they think that they couldn't get it off the ground under current legislation?
Comments 4
(In my dreams).
Reply
The difference being that individuals are not driven by share-holders who want to see maximum profit regardless of the (non-financial) cost. To assume that the majority of businesses will behave responsibly and should only be monitored and/or investigated if they are already perceived to be bad guys (and in whose estimation?) strikes me as abject madness.
And the interesting thing is that, in Mr Meacher's opinion, the Reform Bill is designed to usher in the Action Plan. So presumably they think that they couldn't get it off the ground under current legislation?
Reply
Abject madness it certainly is.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The response seems to amount to "hmm, yes, very worrying"
Reply
Leave a comment