Re: LazyitiswesternindFebruary 10 2005, 11:21:54 UTC
2. "Engels etc" - shorthand for the historicity of marriage as a patriarchal institution. This one bothers Simon more than me, and it doesn't bother either of us nearly as much as it did. More recently I think that it has the nature of a personal and social contract; it's what you decide to make of it
( ... )
Re: Lazyitisscary_ladyFebruary 10 2005, 11:35:29 UTC
Re 2. All kinds of things have a history as patriarchal institutions. Voting, law & medicine spring immediately to mind as things that had to be prised from the unwilling grasp of man. Does marriage benefit man more than woman nowadays, the way it used to? I'd say not.
RE 3. Sorry, I'm feeling very un-intellectual and non-PC, but what constitutes a civil partnership? In what why does this differ from a civil marriage (ie. one in front of a registrar?). I think I'm missing something here that would allow me to understand the distinction you are making.
Comments 8
Have a lovely afternoon. Wish I was with you!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
RE 3. Sorry, I'm feeling very un-intellectual and non-PC, but what constitutes a civil partnership? In what why does this differ from a civil marriage (ie. one in front of a registrar?). I think I'm missing something here that would allow me to understand the distinction you are making.
Reply
Leave a comment