Потери Австро-Венгерской армии в годы ПМВ

Jun 01, 2020 23:42

Источник данных таблиц - приложения к 7-ому тому официальной австрийской истории ПМВ Österreich-Ungarns letzter Krieg 1914 - 1918.

Read more... )

австро-венгрия, потери, первая мировая война, армия

Leave a comment

Comments 39

vaa2138 June 3 2020, 20:24:31 UTC
блестящая работа, как думаете, почему в СССР ни в одной работе по ПВМ не сделали подобных сводок по годам, документы утряны в гражданской?

Reply

schlachtenmaler June 4 2020, 06:03:24 UTC
как думаете, почему в СССР ни в одной работе по ПВМ не сделали подобных сводок по годам
Есть что-то похожее.
http://elib.shpl.ru/ru/nodes/14264-rossiya-v-mirovoy-voyne-1914-1918-goda-v-tsifrah-m-1925#mode/inspect/page/36/zoom/6
Потери по сведениям, полученным с театра военных действий по 31 декабря 1917 года.
документы утряны в гражданской?
Какие-то документы определенно утеряны, но большая часть лежит в РГВИА. Даже в открытом онлайн доступе масса интереснейших доков, но новых научных работ, основанных на их обработке, я не видел.

Reply

vaa2138 June 4 2020, 06:20:31 UTC
Благодарю. А работы Нелиповича? Там оценивается кол-во пленных в 3,6 млн, тогда как у Головина 2,4 , откуда такая разница, эти 1,2 млн. погибли в бою?

Reply

schlachtenmaler June 4 2020, 06:35:14 UTC
Нелипович работает на этой ниве уже довольно давно. Хотелось бы взглянуть не только на анализ потерь, но и на другие аспекты (снабжение, наличие вооружения, санитарная служба и т.д).

Reply


citizenkane1941 June 5 2020, 06:43:34 UTC
Спасибо! Очень интересно!

Reply


unknown128 November 30 2020, 07:32:23 UTC
Curious the losses for 1914 contradict all other numbers Iv seen and surpass even Nelipovichs new numbers ( ... )

Reply

schlachtenmaler November 30 2020, 16:47:35 UTC
Thanks for the valuable comments. To be honest, I don’t know the reason why the losses are so different in these sources. In the near future I will re-read Nelipovich, perhaps I will express my assumptions. Is it okay if I reply in Russian?

Reply

unknown128 November 30 2020, 18:04:14 UTC
Yes I can read Russian very well, I just am bad at writing it.
Do you know if the Austrian losses of wounded and sick are only evacuated like the Russian numbers?

Reply

unknown128 November 30 2020, 18:20:41 UTC
For 1916 Nelipovich adds the number of evacuated sick to the overal wounded number for the Russians, meanwhile for the Austrians at least the sick are clearly excluded from the calculation. On the other hand the number of evacuated does exclude the lightly wounded and it is unclear if they are included in the austrian calculation.

Reply


unknown128 December 1 2020, 01:51:48 UTC
Also the relation between KuK dead and wounded (only soldiers) is curious:
1914 it is 3,37 to 1, 1915 its 3,52 to 1, 1916 its suddenly 4,52 to 1, 1917 it falls back to 3,87 to 1 and 1918 its even 2,77 to 1
Now 1916 is the clear outlier, even more so since the difference is purly due to the Brussilov offensive. In Italy the relation of dead to WIA seems normal, while in Russia its 4,8 to 1. This unusual relation of KIA to WIA implies that many KIA were registered as MIA, since it makes sense if the KuK army retreated to leave its dead behind in the field. But then the KuK MIA number gets inconflict with the Russian POW number, as in it is much smaller......

Now this is not atypical since the Russian MIA number as given by the fronts for 1915 is 882 579 which is smaller then the number 1,2 million POW the central powers claimed for 1915

Reply


unknown128 December 2 2020, 12:11:13 UTC
About the battle of Galicia Nelipovich speaks about 86 300 evacuated sick. Concidering the period of the operation and the overal number of 283 000 sick which means that 30,5% of the sick were at the time of one operation I think its reasonable to clai mthat the numbers for sick mean evacuated and probably the same is true for the wounded. The lightly wounded must hence be excluded from the AH statistics, same as they are excluded from the Russian one.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up