We've heard about how terrible the trouble Detroit is in. Let's have a quick recap:
- Plummeting house values...
- GM gasping for its very life (they just sold Allison Transmissions, heard about that? Look it up, it's a fun[ny] story)...
- Chrysler about to be devoured for its finance arm and dealer network (they'll be importing China's Cherys soon!
( Read more... )
Comments 10
And I'll make a bet that that 134k isnt straight compensation, but totally inflated by the healthcare costs that they're forced to pay out. I'll also venture that they're including the 7.5% employer portion of payroll taxes. In the end, I can almost guarantee they dont have a take home pay of 134k a year. Its probably closer to 60 or 70k.
Reply
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2007/07/uaw-pricing-themselves-out-of-market.html
It seems that it's average "wages and benefits," which _probably_ includes healthcare costs. That would in fact have an affect on the comparison...
...but there's no excuse for the comparison with Toyota, Honda and Nissan.
Reply
Reply
I agree that they would stop hemorrhaging money if their cars were better (and agree, btw, that this is the primary reason that they're tail-spinning into chapter 11 or equivalent).
Even if they made excellent cars, however, their cost control would suck. Mind you, excellent cars would probably justify the extra cost -- you don't see anyone complaining that Porsche spends a lot on labor -- but what I think is that we see both bad products and bad cost-management.
Shame, really. I really, really want to drive up in a 'vette and park next to a next-gen Camaro. Instead, I drive up in my tiny RSX-S and park next to a Jag and a BMW 6-series. There's almost no domestics in our company's parking lot.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The new [3|5|7]-series shows promise, though. The 1 series should be interesting also...
Reply
Leave a comment