Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
sentraaquila
Comma Question
Sep 22, 2006 08:27
Therefore, in 1507, his name was applied to South America, and later extended to North America.
Can I keep the bold commas or is it necessary to omit them?
Leave a comment
Comments 3
the_jackalope
September 22 2006, 14:06:33 UTC
I'd eliminate the second comma and third comma. If you really felt the need for punctuation in the third place you could use a semi-colon.
So it would read: Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America and later extended to North America.
or
Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America; and later extended to North America.
Though honestly I'm a little skeptical about the semicolon there. I'd have to go pull out a grammar book.
Reply
ebneter
September 22 2006, 19:29:16 UTC
Hmmm, I don't think a semicolon works there. I'd write it as:
Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America, and later extended to North America.
Although I might just rephrase it:
Therefore, his name was applied to South America in 1507, and later extended to North America.
Which kind of gets around the issue. ;-) (Actually, I might get rid of the "Therefore," entirely, but that's another matter...)
Reply
the_jackalope
September 22 2006, 19:52:43 UTC
Yea, the more I think about it, the more I agree with you. Though I really do think that no comma should be used before 'and'.
Reply
Leave a comment
Up
Comments 3
So it would read: Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America and later extended to North America.
or
Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America; and later extended to North America.
Though honestly I'm a little skeptical about the semicolon there. I'd have to go pull out a grammar book.
Reply
Therefore, in 1507 his name was applied to South America, and later extended to North America.
Although I might just rephrase it:
Therefore, his name was applied to South America in 1507, and later extended to North America.
Which kind of gets around the issue. ;-) (Actually, I might get rid of the "Therefore," entirely, but that's another matter...)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment