Leave a comment

Comments 8

beamjockey January 27 2011, 15:31:53 UTC
"Four-digit?" So wrong.

Everyone knows that IPv4 stands for four-BIT IP addresses, and the more modern IPv6 standard extends this to six bits.

Reply

sethb January 27 2011, 16:32:33 UTC
They're just catching up to the ARPANET.

Reply

quility January 27 2011, 17:17:57 UTC
ok I have no tech knowledge on this - but based on your comments I'm concluding that this is all false? Or rather that the 6 bit version is in place + works fine + that we aren't going to run out of those anytime soon.

"it will be a matter of four to five months before we run out of IPv4 IP addresses.
After that time Internet users and providers have genuine cause for concern."

So.... this is just fear mongering?

Reply

sethb January 27 2011, 18:07:44 UTC
ipV4 is 32 bits (about 10 decimal digits if a single number, usually expressed as 4 up-to-3-digit numbers like 127.0.0.1).

ipV6 is 128 bits.

In one sense, we're already "out of" ipV4 addresses. However, half the ones that have been issued have never been routed. If they were to become sellable for real money, a lot of them would magically become available.

There are also a lot of addresses that haven't been issued, but could be (e.g. experimental address space).

Reply


barondave January 27 2011, 16:14:33 UTC
Well, you've got to admit it's awfully close to being wrong.

Reply


carbonel January 27 2011, 20:38:15 UTC
Looks like they fixed it.

Reply

sethb January 27 2011, 22:06:03 UTC
I guess even they can get laughed at too much.

For a very small value of "fixed", anyway:

"But IPv6 isn't backwards-compatible with IPv4, meaning that it's not able to read most content that operates on an IPv4 system. At best, the user experience will be clunky and slow."

That isn't even close to being wrong.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up