Comments | sgoodspeed: Hehehe...

sgoodspeed

Hehehe...

Mar 21, 2003 11:36

Well... that last debate when to hell. So, I promised everyone on my final reply that the next topic wouldn't be so heated. So...

Too Much/Too Little sex in Music Videos?

Have Fun

Comments 20

tcats March 21 2003, 08:47:59 UTC

is there ever realy too much??
"wanna get DIRTY!" lol

i don't watch them much AT ALL anymore, but i'm sure the family quality of some of them is on the decline

monkey_funkel March 21 2003, 08:53:37 UTC

Ahh...I believe it's "DIRRTY"

srcosmo March 21 2003, 09:31:51 UTC

whoa, speaking of which, dudes: This music video is kind of a fun take on the whole hip hop video thing

Re: monkey_funkel March 21 2003, 10:49:19 UTC

ho ho

Thread 7

zeegs March 21 2003, 11:41:26 UTC

I don't really get to watch music videos here, but from what I remember another good question would be: is there enough music in music videos? The music viseo changed the face of music, it made image more important then the music in a lot of cases. If the music video had never happened do you think that music as a whole now would be of a higher quality? Would the talent of the artist become more important then their image?

jigsaw666 March 21 2003, 13:19:10 UTC

I listen to a few bands that don't make videos, now i have no idea if there can be said be a relationship, but i do know that their music is amazingly good.

jigsaw666 March 21 2003, 13:17:11 UTC

I don't watch mushmusic or MTV, well, i mean, i don't watch any TV, but i make a point of not watching those.
I think a lot of music videos are stupid, 3 minute commercials, i think they're degrading, disgusting and stupid. I can't believe that"artists" like brtney spears, who claims to be a role model for young girls, acts the way she does. It's sick. No wonder we have fucked up kids now.
That having been said, i've seen a few that are well made and have good messages. But for the most part, ick. music videos suck.

zeegs March 21 2003, 14:09:52 UTC

agreed

another steve-esq website jigsaw666 June 11 2003, 13:45:54 UTC

http://www.powerlabs.org/railgun.htm

Re: another steve-esq website sgoodspeed June 12 2003, 08:03:17 UTC

Well... depending on how fast the projectile moves... and accelerates... theoretically I can make a perpetual motion machine out of a rail gun. I thought about it a while ago, but never really checked up on it.

It's possible if the rail's are curved in a complete circle. Yes it would be pretty big... however if the projectile was connected to a central shaft in the middle of the rail gun... then it is possible to drive multiple turbines with it. And depending on how fast it goes, it could be used to re-route power back to itself... thus being perpetual.

Food for thought.
Steve

Re: another steve-esq website jigsaw666 June 13 2003, 07:38:03 UTC

ahh, steve... it doesn't matter how fast it goes, because an object can't generate it's own power. it requires an external force, and nothing can change that.
The only route is to achieve 100% efficency. that means no loss to heat, friction, or air resistance. that's what you really need to figure out.

Re: another steve-esq website sgoodspeed June 13 2003, 08:35:46 UTC

oh my dan, you would love what I'm working on now.

Take the moving mass out of the equation, because the only thing that really matters is the magnetic fields and electrons. So fuck having a turbine and all this frictional shit. Take it out.

What's left? Well... that's something to explain over the phone. (613)-526-1391...

I can only tell you that my 'new' motor design is completely frictionless. Why? Because there are no moving parts.

LOL

Steve

Thread 9