Heroes, I mean Villains, I mean, whatever...
It's already been said in other blogs, but last night's Heroes? SUCKED. And hard.
The whole Sylar/Electrogirl (I refuse to legitimize it with their actual character names) romance subplot? So, what, she only became the vapid, selfish, no-morals witch we met AFTER falling in, then out, of love with Sylar?
And Glasses Man - he let Sylar GO? 'Scuse me, think I'd have been feeling EVEN MORE GUILT when the man went after my daughter if I had HAD HIM IN MY GRASP AND THEN LET HIM SLIP AWAY!
And why Why WHY would they have kept Claire named "Claire" if they STOLE HER FROM ANOTHER ABILITY'D PERSON WHO THEY THEN LEFT ALIVE?!? I mean, CRIPES! Change the kid's name! She was a baby, not like she'd have been too attached to it!
And Linderman as fawning sycophant? Hated it. Even if it was just an act.
As I said in a comment on someone else's blog, whoever decided to introduce retconning to Heroes as a GOOD idea is an asshole. Or, as I told my wife, "look, they're pissing all over season one so they can 'save' season three!"
Gah.
The whole Sylar/Electrogirl (I refuse to legitimize it with their actual character names) romance subplot? So, what, she only became the vapid, selfish, no-morals witch we met AFTER falling in, then out, of love with Sylar?
And Glasses Man - he let Sylar GO? 'Scuse me, think I'd have been feeling EVEN MORE GUILT when the man went after my daughter if I had HAD HIM IN MY GRASP AND THEN LET HIM SLIP AWAY!
And why Why WHY would they have kept Claire named "Claire" if they STOLE HER FROM ANOTHER ABILITY'D PERSON WHO THEY THEN LEFT ALIVE?!? I mean, CRIPES! Change the kid's name! She was a baby, not like she'd have been too attached to it!
And Linderman as fawning sycophant? Hated it. Even if it was just an act.
As I said in a comment on someone else's blog, whoever decided to introduce retconning to Heroes as a GOOD idea is an asshole. Or, as I told my wife, "look, they're pissing all over season one so they can 'save' season three!"
Gah.