FINALLY watched the "new" Star Trek movie last night. Y'know, the one that's about 2 years old, with baby!Kirk being born and young!Spock (that actor from Heroes). I loved it, although I had suspend a LOT of disbelief. Teen boy heaven. Oh yeah baby, 17 years old and you can drive the Enterprise. All those cadets running around in charge. Yeah,
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Yay, catching up with the rest of us. I'm so proud of you!
Poor SO. At least he tried.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've long accepted that this is a true reboot. There's nothing of old Trek, except some of the nostalgia, in this series. Abrams maintains that this is a reimagining of the series and not a redo. That's why it's frustrating to see all the speculation of whether or not Cumberbatch is some villain from TOS. I highly doubt Abrams would pick Khan, for example, since we've already seen what happened to his character. Why do a reboot when there's no tension to be mined from that?
I understand SO's reaction. It's a lot to buy into. But I love Karl Urban's Bones and I live for Simon Pegg's reaction shots alone. So I can suspend disbelief.
Reply
I did love it though. Adored Spock. And I thought Simon Pegg was a hobbit, but Google has set me straight.
Reply
The rest of them I would've drowned. Twice. Kirk was a dick. I wouldn't put him in charge of a chook raffle. I'm afraid I'm with the SO on this. I thought it was tripe (although, tripe with splodey bits!).
Reply
I'll see the sequel, but there's no way I'll get SO to watch. Once he's made up his mind on something there's no budging him. Still can't trick him into watching BSG. *sigh*
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
also might be slightly miffed that they literally erased all of Voyager from existence...
I think of it as an AU. Like "Living Witness" fic, but not as good.
Reply
Leave a comment