Burma 'guilty of inhuman action' I should have thought it was inhuman inaction. At least China's holding up much better. But I realised something: in earthquakes, it's the buildings that collapse and trap people that kill people, not the earthquake itself, right?
:(
Comments 7
Interesting point. I'm thinking about the ramifications of this. As a matter of fact, the Geography teacher (not mine because I don't take it) was saying that the pandas were probably unaffected (can't remember, but he mentioned something funny in relation to this). Down with buildings!
Reply
Reply
Of course, I don't mean the buildings aren't at fault. This is a rapidly modernised country with decentralised provincial rule and little maintenance or authorization on building ethics. Duh there'd be 'tofu' buildings.
As for Myanmar, it isn't just inhuman inaction, there's a lot of unfortunate geology ... 1/3 of its boundaries are coastal, and the Irrawaddy delta is low-lying with high population. Any tropical cyclone would damage it severely.
Reply
Reply
If we all lived in mongolian-like bamboo cloth tents, even if they collapsed nobody would die.
Or even better, if we lived under the stars on a green field, you'd just have a nice vibrating sensation?!
Reply
Nice vibrating sensation is pulling it a bit far - I think it's more like terrifying homogeniser shaking, which would be very much more terrifying if you lived near some place with loose rocks on the side of a mountain (because that can kill people too).
Reply
8Db
Reply
Leave a comment