Furaffinity

Nov 25, 2010 10:42

The revised AUP on FA does leave me worried as to how long until other things are not allowed ( Read more... )

furries, furaffinity, wtf?

Leave a comment

Comments 6

xianjaguar November 25 2010, 20:59:16 UTC
I'm pretty sure they'll ALWAYS allow you to post art that you've personally commissioned from other artists, so you'll never be without anything to post.
Plus, you do 3-D art - wood carvings- and they'll always be allowed as well.

I wouldn't worry!

Reply

sheepdog November 26 2010, 04:50:59 UTC
Thanks.

Reply


crashska November 26 2010, 03:57:29 UTC
Nope, vore is still A-OK. It's not real, you know. Just because someone likes seeing images of characters being eaten doesn't mean they want to do it in real life. Why would anyone think there's a correlation between liking art of cannibalism and wanting to do it in real life? /sarc

Dragoneer likes vore, so I imagine it'll be welcomed until someone convinces another payment company that it's the same as cannibalism.

Reply

sheepdog November 26 2010, 04:53:09 UTC
LOL!

Reply


alcyione November 26 2010, 04:27:47 UTC
FA is more or less in bed with Watch Your Step (lol, fail), so I expect that it's going to become more and more... eh, how do I put this delicately?

WYS has an agenda. They're out to quiet "pedos and dogfuckers" at any cost, and I feel like they're going to be a driving force in censoring FA.

My thoughts? Don't like it? Don't look. Vore gives me panic attacks, so you don't see me seeking it out, subjecting myself to looking at it (in order to catch the "criminals" drawing that stuff). I click the X button and get the hell out of there.

This... "nanny state" mentality is giving me the shits.

Reply

sheepdog November 26 2010, 05:00:55 UTC
Hm, I wonder if an anthro having sex with a feral would be considered terms for banning then? And does everything have to look like a Winger drew it to pass as above the age restriction?
I guess were in for an interesting ride then.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up