Rant Post

Mar 16, 2012 22:06

Previous (Full) Rant Post

No real directions, but this isn't a place for debate. It's a place for RANTIN' AND RAVIN'.

There is a rule: There is to be no calling out anyone by name in Rants, Chatter, or on the Meme itself. This only produces an atmosphere of animosity and it is no longer tolerated. If you see any names being ranted about, please link ( Read more... )

off topic by nature, rants

Leave a comment

Comments 9979

five prompts you want to see filled anonymous March 17 2012, 03:01:44 UTC
Current and past prompt posts welcome.

Reply

Re: five prompts you want to see filled anonymous March 17 2012, 03:04:05 UTC
Is it strange that I want a five times + 1 of 5 characters + 1 requesting 5 times + 1 fic 5 times + 1

Reply

Re: five prompts you want to see filled anonymous March 17 2012, 03:09:15 UTC
That blew my mind for a second there. Just a second, but still. I thought you ought to know. <3

Reply

Re: five prompts you want to see filled anonymous March 17 2012, 03:53:33 UTC
:D Thanks BB
thank-you five times... PLUS ONE

Reply


SWtF drinking game anonymous March 17 2012, 03:03:19 UTC
I think there should be a Swinging With the Finkels drinking game.

You drink when

-- something racist happens
-- there's a ridiculous portrayal of homosexuality in general
-- kink is played for laughs
-- Alvin does something stupid and isn't called on it

If you want to get blitzed in about two seconds, drink every time you have to wonder why we're supposed to believe that they're married. Mandy Moore was about 25 when this was filmed, and they're supposed to have been married for 9 years at this point. LOL NO. Also she's a designer successful enough to have her own assistant and, IDEK, an atelier full of gorgeous fabric and she's not working her ass off? She's always off somewhere. I just don't know.

Also, Amanda Abbington has been in it for about 2 seconds so far. I am disappoint.

Still, Martin is very lovely.

Reply

Re: SWtF drinking game (minor spoilers for the movie? Maybe?) meredydd March 17 2012, 03:32:39 UTC
I watched it the other day and came away from it going "well, that was a really long episode of a tv show that won't get renewed next season." It wasn't sucktastic but it wasn't great. Reasons you mentioned, above, and I just really didn't buy the chemistry or lack thereof between the two of them. Also, I was legit disappointed in the lack of, you know, swinging. It was maybe ten minutes of the whole movie and then it wasn't... It was like "Oh, ha, just kidding! See, kink can ruin lives, kids! Stay in school."

Reply

Re: SWtF drinking game (minor spoilers for the movie? Maybe?) anonymous March 17 2012, 03:48:44 UTC
I keep pausing it because it's so bad. If I were Mandy Moore I'd be pissed, too, at that mural on their landing. Martin's likeness is very good. Her-- not at all.

Their hug on the landing before they went to their separate rooms was kind of cute, I was hoping they'd meet up in the morning all unable to keep their hands off each other and just energized and bouncy, and then they and the other couple have a lovely brunch. And then next weekend maybe they get together to do something date-y, like, IDEK, they go to the Notting Hill farmers market or something. They walk on the embankment, they go to a play. They go on a date. I want a lovely episode of the two couples wooing each other and then I want them to stay friends and sometimes have sex and sometimes not and that would have been lovely.

It would be fine too of course if they're like oh hey this is a one-off, thank you, this was fun, good night and good luck.

But... based on what you said I'm thinking well, it'll probably be neither of those things.

Reply

Re: SWtF drinking game (minor spoilers for the movie? Maybe?) meredydd March 17 2012, 03:55:24 UTC
They brought it 'round for a rom com sweet ending but the kink angle (I'm really nitpicking that one lol) seemed to be more of a warning than a legit life choice or experiment. The movie had it's moments but they really handled the swinging part poorly. The interviews were a bit funny but the actual swinging part? Eh. I agree--I'd have loved to see it handled in a dating way and not how it was... And Alvin SO got away with so much bullshit that I wondered why they were still married to start with.

Reply


COMMENTS AND VALIDATION: SHERLOCK EDITION anonymous March 17 2012, 03:08:17 UTC
How many comments or kudos do you need to feel your fic has done well? What factors (pairing, rating, etc.) do you consider relevant? At what point do you pack up your toys and go home?

Reply

Re: COMMENTS AND VALIDATION: SHERLOCK EDITION anonymous March 17 2012, 03:21:41 UTC
On the meme? I just need at least one, really, though I've never had a fill that got less than two.

The only two things that counteract that are:
1. The OP not responding
2. Getting fewer comments on an update of a WIP than I have on previous updates, especially if there's a logged in user who's consistently commented before

I know there are tons of reasons that these two things can happen that have nothing to do with anyone disliking what I've written, but I still get kind of paranoid.

Reply

Re: COMMENTS AND VALIDATION: SHERLOCK EDITION anonymous March 17 2012, 03:24:17 UTC
If I get over 3 comments on a Moriarty/Moran fic I post on LJ/the meme, I consider it a job well done. Strangely enough, it's a lot easier to wheedle comments out of people on Tumblr (although I've stopped posting there because I got sick of the wank, the childishness, and certain people trying to run the ship ( ... )

Reply

Re: COMMENTS AND VALIDATION: SHERLOCK EDITION anonymous March 17 2012, 03:44:15 UTC
On the meme:
For John/Sherlock, at least six comments.
For other pairings, at least four.
If it's multiple parts, four per update.

I'm okay with less, but when it gets that many I feel it's a general "well done, fic" marker.

I've never packed my toys and gone home, but I'd probably abandon a WIP that wasn't getting any comments, or that was only getting one per update. If someone started a wank on my fic, I might still finish but I'd probably leave it anonymous because I'd be too embarrassed to claim after that.

On AO3 with the kudos system, I have no idea how to measure "my fic has done well" there. I look at the kudos count in utter confusion.

Reply


AUGH anonymous March 17 2012, 03:29:55 UTC
I'VE NOT BEEN PAID IN A MONTH DUE TO SOME TECHNICAL COCKUP. THEY SAID I'D BE PAID TODAY, NOT HAPPENED. I DON'T THINK I SHOULD EVEN BOTHER GOING INTO WORK TOMORROW GOD SAKE.

Reply

Re: AUGH anonymous March 17 2012, 03:38:10 UTC
CONTACT YOUR UNION REP.

Reply

Re: AUGH anonymous March 17 2012, 13:25:08 UTC
NAYRT

I DON'T KNOW ANYONE WITH A UNION REP. DOES EVERYONE IN THE US HAVE A UNION?

Reply

Re: AUGH anonymous March 17 2012, 13:49:28 UTC
Hahahahahahahahaha!

No.

Reply


anonymous March 17 2012, 03:36:43 UTC
When I was a kid I used to feel everyone's problems all the time. I was a serious little thing.

Now I'm an adult and after a few shaky starts and attempts at medication, I can finally consider myself a healthy, content and well-rounded person. There's only one problem: after spending my teenage years and early adulthood in a fog of mental illness, it seems like I missed out on the "learning empathy" part of development.

I know that there are other anons on this rant meme who have had problems with mental illness, and lots of anons who either are now or who used to be bad at social skills. I recognise that empathy would be a good thing to have. So do any of you crazy nonnies know how I could improve my empathising skills? I've definitely made progress in the past year and can fake it to the point where nobody can really tell the difference, but it's still... well, fake.

Reply

anonymous March 17 2012, 04:12:55 UTC
I can't read facial expressions, so, sadly, i will be of no help to you.

Reply

anonymous March 17 2012, 04:24:43 UTC
AYRT

Can you not empathise without the ability to read facial expressions? That's interesting. I'm bad at judging affect, which is another thing I've been working on recently.

Reply

anonymous March 17 2012, 13:22:49 UTC
I can empathise somewhat...it just takes me longer to realize that I need to. (Basically, people around me have to use words to tell me how they feel.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up