On Contravercial Movies

May 31, 2006 16:57

I watched Da Vinci Code about two weeks ago. A little late for a review. But I think the show was worst than the book. I think Tom Hanks should just stick to being a retard or simpleton (which was what he did best in Forest Gump and Green Mile ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

sidneyficance June 1 2006, 09:22:50 UTC
I think at the end, you would laugh at what our government calls contravercial...
Hmmmm...switching the Zone can be quite tricky...
I should have thought of that. Anyway, I thought computers can auto switch for 5 times or something?

Reply


ioogleguys June 1 2006, 02:04:32 UTC
sophie = audrey tautou. i liked her ever since I watched Amelie and was about the only reason I would watch da vinci code.

anyway, it was an interesting take on the movie. I didn't watch it nor do I plan to watch it because I think all the hype around it being "the most controversial movie for 2006" or whatever is ridiculous. dan brown wasn't planning on writing propaganda... he's a FICTION writer. people should stop saying the movie is filled with lies / keep coming up with books to disprove "the da vinci code" solely because IT IS FICTION. Do people feel the need to write "cracking the harry potter code" as well?? since hogwarts doesn't exist, does that mean JK Rowling wrote a bunch of lies, and hence, the harry potter series is the most controversial series evAr, etc etc?

anyway, i don't like dan brown. he takes other people's research and basically pastes the same story line over and over again for all his books. and he does little research of his own. bah!!

Reply

sidneyficance June 1 2006, 09:19:10 UTC
Haha kinda like how some people in UTAR are...Main tiru aje, in year 3 still being a parasite...

But the book Holy Blood, Holy Grail was not too bad.

Propaganda is twigs having no souls.

Reply


mykgerard June 1 2006, 23:17:52 UTC
Did you ever see Big? That was a great role for Tom Hanks... He used to not be so serious.

Reply

sidneyficance June 3 2006, 15:25:13 UTC
No.
But yeah, he fits in better in non-serious roles.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up