(only not the SNL kind)
Friday: Saw Sin City with Nathan. It was excellent. It's essentially two and a half hours of artistic, film-noir gore and hookers with guns. There's even an entire sequence of Clive Owen (I don't think his jaw could have been so manly without computer effects) talking about Valkyries while almost naked women pull fancy
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
re: saturday - are you A side?
re: sunday - my (non-jewish) friend and i just exchanged "happy passover" IMs ... i don't really know why you would care about that. except that i'm working on it ;)
Reply
re: re: saturday - No, I'm not that cool. Especially since B side played with three TCNJ forwards.
re: re: sunday - Um. Way to recruit?
Reply
Reply
Your boyfriend can suck it up... Clive Owen doesn't begin to make up for massive amounts of naked women fanservice.
"BOTH of them" was excellent. Although I did like "you've got a bum ticker!" too.
Reply
Frank Miller's gender politics are, everyone in comics fandom I've met agrees, massively fucked-up. Still: I felt that not only was the movie's attitude towards sex and women "part of the film noir style", but also that that specific line, given by that specific guy, was being presented to us absolutely as a character note-- not as even the, you know, belief argued by the entire movie (as you said, I think the movie's style intentionally left its viewers room to take it ironically), or the belief held by the producers; but rather importation information about this character-- considering that it came fairly early in his vignette-- and his undeniably objectifying (etc.) yet oddly, sweetly chivalrous understanding of women.
I think I got this feeling so strongly because of a combination of how ridiculous that line is to me and, I thiiink, anyone with even a shallow contemporary idea of homosexuality; and of how the line was delivered (both of terms of the actor ( ... )
Reply
Out of curiousity, what do you think about the fact that only men were involved in castrating eachother?
[I also feel obligated to say that your "objectifying yet chivalrous" should be "objectifyingly chivalrous", but I think that's beside the specific point.]
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment