Will physics ever be able to tacker the biggest questions - for instance, why does the universe even bother to exist?
Science is not religion. We're not going to be able to answer the "why" questions. [...]
This sounds like your formula for keeping science and religion from fighting with each other.A lot of scientists take the Stephen Jay Gould
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
On one hand my company’s belief might not be really wrong, the 2 presidents are nice people, and the members are not forced to believe. On the other hand we can’t ask American consumers to wait for something for >= 2 years when they might have other options. We can't ask that!
Reply
Could "anonymous" clarify what you're trying to say? And, preferably, not be anonymous next time?
Reply
Reply
2. What are you trying to say?
Reply
"This might earn me some enemies, but in some ways they may be even more moral. If you do something for a religious reason, you do it because you'll be rewarded in an afterlife or in this world. That's not quite as good as something you do for purely generous reasons.Many people's religious conceptions are of the 'I do this because I want a good afterlife', a carrot-and-stick (heaven-and-hell) motivation. But many religious perspectives are more nuanced than that - they see the religiously ordained morality as simply a statement of truth, as what one should (in a categorical or 'this is how it is meant to be' rather than a 'mom says I should' sort of way) do as a human being / immortal soul / whatever. Or there is the concept of love of God - a perspective where heaven or hell is besides the point because one feel such love for God that one is compelled (or at least wants to, even if one fails a lot) to do good because he asks it. Or even there ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment