Well the inherient problem with standardized magic is that we are still too small of a base to determine that. We are only 2 people! Sure we can come up with a lot, but I'd like to have a larger pools of brains to use before we start standardizing magic
( ... )
Glittery Magic? lolsilentthundertAugust 4 2004, 08:07:46 UTC
lol, this ought to be interesting. Glittery magic as a magic type. Fun stuff. Can't wait to see what kinda stuff it does. Since glittery magic isn't a mainstream magic type, you'll need to define it for us. (We all know what fire is, so what is glittery magic?)
you could also have the elements darkness and wood, possibly even light, also i'd say that ice should fall under water, since if you can manipulate water it wouldn't be that hard to make ice, just my opinion.
Comments 6
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The journal's information page must have your bio in it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment