O_o no ego in the "modest to the extreem" sense? or truely no ego to the point of having no sense of self what so ever? (which i've only heard of happening to people on DMT)
like just his words are 'I have no ego.' I thought ego was the I, and that every human had an I in this world, to make use of in the most intelligent and good way possible. but he assures he's got no ego, and wants me to get rid of mine. I cannot conceive this, because I have an I, and if I don't have it, I am just non-existing??
O_o how strange... Well first off if he's talking about ego in the "I" sense as you said, to say "I have no ego" contradicts itself, if there is no ego, there is no I.
Though it is possible to loose ones ego temporarily (as I said before, under the influence of DMT usually), it wouldn't be a state you'd really be able to function within society in, how do you talk to and relate to other people when you have zero sense of self? Unless he really does act like he isn't an independant entity on a daily basis, I'd say he's pulling your chain.
btw luv, we all say truth always all ways, interpretation is reflection and mirrors don't lie. What was said was a stage of growth, A lesson to be recognized as a lesson.
Concieving deconception is simple, it's subtraction, which is letting go or slipping, sliding, and wheeee.
As long as "we" use "I" we will always have "I" to use. We do not "have" I, we use I as a method.
If we are one, if we re u.n.i.on (you and I, on) We are you and I on, if we are uson or weon or just on we still hold "on" to layer concept as on requires under and one requires two just as all requires many and we requires them.
Letting go of "it" means letting go of both i and t. It means letting go go without "it" as a second name for go.
is go, go or is go, it?
Why does God contain od. oddly enough, without relativity, one as three is odd. No comparison. Third person is a stepping stone to what has been termed unity or UN-it.y... why it? UN!
That's a fallacy: he must have a sense of self if he questioning a fundemental part of himself - that is, a function of the brain that gives a sense of self for social and evolutionary reasons. Indeed it sort of sounds extremely egotiscal actually - and perhaps narcissistic - to make such a sweeping statement.
Infact, just ignore him. His ego is being massaged intensely by the fact that you're arguing with him about it, even though he claiming he doesn't have one. No doubt from an early childhood his parents, or some other person in close proximity, instilled the words "special" and "different" in his mind, and that's the best he's came up with.
He's nothing more than mummy's little sepcial boy, I tell thee.
when ego recognizes that all ego is ego and there is no number of egos but solely without number ego then ego recognizes that all e-goes and transcendance of e-going is e-stopping. e can stop and go, but when e stops e is not go e is stop
( ... )
i think it's possible for a person to transcend their ego, move into the sense of being the One Consciousness so completely and constantly that they leave their entire personal identity behind. i wonder if that's the height of enlightenment?
but if someone's walking around talking about their lack of ego, i'd say they have to have one. if you can say the words "*i* have no *ego*" you've just shot your statement in the foot. if statements had feet, that is.
Comments 8
no ego in the "modest to the extreem" sense? or truely no ego to the point of having no sense of self what so ever? (which i've only heard of happening to people on DMT)
Reply
I thought ego was the I, and that every human had an I in this world, to make use of in the most intelligent and good way possible.
but he assures he's got no ego, and wants me to get rid of mine. I cannot conceive this, because I have an I, and if I don't have it, I am just non-existing??
Reply
Well first off if he's talking about ego in the "I" sense as you said, to say "I have no ego" contradicts itself, if there is no ego, there is no I.
Though it is possible to loose ones ego temporarily (as I said before, under the influence of DMT usually), it wouldn't be a state you'd really be able to function within society in, how do you talk to and relate to other people when you have zero sense of self?
Unless he really does act like he isn't an independant entity on a daily basis, I'd say he's pulling your chain.
Reply
Concieving deconception is simple, it's subtraction, which is letting go or slipping, sliding, and wheeee.
As long as "we" use "I" we will always have "I" to use. We do not "have" I, we use I as a method.
If we are one, if we re u.n.i.on (you and I, on) We are you and I on, if we are uson or weon or just on we still hold "on" to layer concept as on requires under and one requires two just as all requires many and we requires them.
Letting go of "it" means letting go of both i and t. It means letting go go without "it" as a second name for go.
is go, go or is go, it?
Why does God contain od. oddly enough, without relativity, one as three is odd. No comparison. Third person is a stepping stone to what has been termed unity or UN-it.y... why it? UN!
Reply
Infact, just ignore him. His ego is being massaged intensely by the fact that you're arguing with him about it, even though he claiming he doesn't have one. No doubt from an early childhood his parents, or some other person in close proximity, instilled the words "special" and "different" in his mind, and that's the best he's came up with.
He's nothing more than mummy's little sepcial boy, I tell thee.
Reply
Reply
but if someone's walking around talking about their lack of ego, i'd say they have to have one. if you can say the words "*i* have no *ego*" you've just shot your statement in the foot. if statements had feet, that is.
cheers.
Reply
e is representative of go
e=go
do "I" "have" e, going? or does e, going, have me?
I AM ego, I do not "have" "an" ego.
I AM e-going.
Reply
Leave a comment