Pull up a chair and imagine something with me. It's the paleolithic era and a man has decided to gather members of his tribe (Much as I'm doing with you now) to hear a story. It is a time before the broadening of language, before the development of poetic form. Stories in this time are starkly functional: The story of what has happened, the
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
If someone wanted to claim that art simply stems from extraneous language then it's easy to make the peacock argument; that descriptive vocabulary evolved from a need to adorn functional stories so that they became more memorable and more widely told. That's how I take McCloud to think, and he's probably right as far as that goes, but that's more a matter of memetics, than art.
I'd agree with you though. What I think is that the potential for stories to become art existed even when vocabulary was restricted to functional terms. It's the desire on the part of the storyteller to communicate something that he personally considers of value to the well-being and ultimate survival of his tribe that differentiates the story as art. And that impulse says something beautiful and fascinating about human nature to me.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment