I'd like to congratulate the West Side
The story began with this:
So, it seems that young boys on bicycles (no long-haired boys in I-ROCs, no) only try to talk to me when I wear a skirt. Can't a person wear a skirt to feel/look good anymore? Last time, and Rob knows this story well, this guy offered me the chance to make 50 bucks for something I did not find out what.
This time, west side of Windsor, two low-brow guys, one on a bicycle, are saying hi to me, and I go "Are you only talking to me because I'm wearing a skirt?" as I put my headphones (Rebel Yell by Billy Idol at the time) back on and keep walking, but the guy on the bike gives a shrill short whistle to get my attention, like I'm a dog! I tell him to leave me alone, very firmly. Then he tries to invite me to a party and I go "I don't party, I don't drink, and I don't party--I know I just said that twice" and then they were gone--took the route through the park beside the sidewalk I was walking on.
God, I can tell that these boys' mothers probably died long ago if not still sitting around being treated like shit. I can also tell that guys like these probably lose in a game of word-association after one round, especially when it comes to anything to do with girls. ("skirt-dick," game one done, "prickly rashes-dick," game two, "yeast infections-dick," game three)
But then I became emphathetic.
I mean, people with terrible social skills will likely never improve on them if civilized people who can help them practice those skills won't have the patience to stick around. It's sad that after many trials of "wanna go to a party?" "NO!" *SLAP* that they just DON'T GET IT. They don't get that "Hey, maybe this method isn't so great."
Then, I go back to thinking that stereotypes of guys and sex are only because of the way their bodies are designed--because they can orgasm easily and cum incessantly even several times a day.
Maybe it isn't fair that guys "always want more." Probably because orgasms are almost no big deal to them because they're so common, and so easy, and they want it now because it can take only a few minutes. Meanwhile, orgasms for girls seem to be a big goal-setting thing, or "Project O" as mine is called. But guys, sure, they want more because they can have many, easily. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT ALL GUYS HERE, THOUGH.
And guys, because they can cum so easily and orgasm all the time, this is what gives them their male power in sex relations and porno hierarchies. A guy can get pleasure more easily than a girl, it seems, and the girls who fake only further encourage their disatisfaction if guys think that their performance is benefitting both of them (assuming heterosexual terms, sorry) and he stops when he thinks they're both satisfied. Sure, women's vaginas are powerful over men, but I think men's sexual abilities force them into an easily accusable chauvinist role.
Am I making up excuses for sleazy dudes? Should I just say fuck feeling sorry for the world, and just unleash the steel-toe boots and kick some ass? Actually, I was thinking of what tactic I would have used to "defend myself" if I had to.
Do you grab the bike first? He was riding/walking, so his bike would not have easily come out of his hold. Do I kick his ass first, or kick the guy standing? Probably the guy standing because the guy on the bike would have to take time to drop his bike to do anything, so that would give me time. If I go for the bike guy first, the walking guy could easily kick my ass from behind. ROB, HELP ME! What would be the right move to do?? My martial arts needs some practice!
So, it seems that young boys on bicycles (no long-haired boys in I-ROCs, no) only try to talk to me when I wear a skirt. Can't a person wear a skirt to feel/look good anymore? Last time, and Rob knows this story well, this guy offered me the chance to make 50 bucks for something I did not find out what.
This time, west side of Windsor, two low-brow guys, one on a bicycle, are saying hi to me, and I go "Are you only talking to me because I'm wearing a skirt?" as I put my headphones (Rebel Yell by Billy Idol at the time) back on and keep walking, but the guy on the bike gives a shrill short whistle to get my attention, like I'm a dog! I tell him to leave me alone, very firmly. Then he tries to invite me to a party and I go "I don't party, I don't drink, and I don't party--I know I just said that twice" and then they were gone--took the route through the park beside the sidewalk I was walking on.
God, I can tell that these boys' mothers probably died long ago if not still sitting around being treated like shit. I can also tell that guys like these probably lose in a game of word-association after one round, especially when it comes to anything to do with girls. ("skirt-dick," game one done, "prickly rashes-dick," game two, "yeast infections-dick," game three)
But then I became emphathetic.
I mean, people with terrible social skills will likely never improve on them if civilized people who can help them practice those skills won't have the patience to stick around. It's sad that after many trials of "wanna go to a party?" "NO!" *SLAP* that they just DON'T GET IT. They don't get that "Hey, maybe this method isn't so great."
Then, I go back to thinking that stereotypes of guys and sex are only because of the way their bodies are designed--because they can orgasm easily and cum incessantly even several times a day.
Maybe it isn't fair that guys "always want more." Probably because orgasms are almost no big deal to them because they're so common, and so easy, and they want it now because it can take only a few minutes. Meanwhile, orgasms for girls seem to be a big goal-setting thing, or "Project O" as mine is called. But guys, sure, they want more because they can have many, easily. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT ALL GUYS HERE, THOUGH.
And guys, because they can cum so easily and orgasm all the time, this is what gives them their male power in sex relations and porno hierarchies. A guy can get pleasure more easily than a girl, it seems, and the girls who fake only further encourage their disatisfaction if guys think that their performance is benefitting both of them (assuming heterosexual terms, sorry) and he stops when he thinks they're both satisfied. Sure, women's vaginas are powerful over men, but I think men's sexual abilities force them into an easily accusable chauvinist role.
Am I making up excuses for sleazy dudes? Should I just say fuck feeling sorry for the world, and just unleash the steel-toe boots and kick some ass? Actually, I was thinking of what tactic I would have used to "defend myself" if I had to.
Do you grab the bike first? He was riding/walking, so his bike would not have easily come out of his hold. Do I kick his ass first, or kick the guy standing? Probably the guy standing because the guy on the bike would have to take time to drop his bike to do anything, so that would give me time. If I go for the bike guy first, the walking guy could easily kick my ass from behind. ROB, HELP ME! What would be the right move to do?? My martial arts needs some practice!