you are so NOT RIGHT. it is poorly phrased, but check it out...
you probably don't have to never touch the computer again just cause you got a new job.
if i had said "you probably have to never touch the computer again just cause you got a new job." it wouldn't make any sense. likewise, if i said "you probably don't have to ever touch the computer again just cause you got a new job." it would be the exact opposite of what i was trying to say.
what i SHOULD have said is "you probably don't have to stop touching the computer all together just because you got a new job" but the GRAMMAR IS STILL RIGHT.
maybe they do legally, but it's still stupid. and i was listening to this song this morning, that reminded me of you, but only in the "you scummy bitch!" sense of you. he says all this stuff, and if he said "you scummy bitch!" it would fit PERFECT.
Comments 7
you probably don't have to never touch the computer again just cause you got a new job.
if i had said "you probably have to never touch the computer again just cause you got a new job." it wouldn't make any sense. likewise, if i said "you probably don't have to ever touch the computer again just cause you got a new job." it would be the exact opposite of what i was trying to say.
what i SHOULD have said is "you probably don't have to stop touching the computer all together just because you got a new job" but the GRAMMAR IS STILL RIGHT.
I'M THE MASTER.
Reply
i already told you that you were right about that.
i've been fighting with bosco as to whether or not two negatives make a positive.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment