Leave a comment

Comments 5

meganeko_mausuu March 13 2009, 17:40:38 UTC
*hugglepounces* Kender says, "What about love at first ribboning?" ^^

Reply

skorpy March 13 2009, 17:44:00 UTC
Well, that's knowing someone in the biblical sense. However, I don't think that's long enough for love to develop, so it falls under 'infatuation and obsession'.

I mean, you can fall for someone easily, you just need time to confirm if you want to spend your life with them.

Reply

meganeko_mausuu March 13 2009, 17:59:23 UTC
Hmm... I've loved people before but not wanted to spend my life with them... but then I think there are different types and levels of love, too.

Also, Kender is pouting because she was trying to tease you and Luc with her question, and you didn't go for it.

Reply

skorpy March 13 2009, 18:05:14 UTC
There are indeed many types of love, but only one word for the whole slew of them. It's limiting, frankly, but I feel they all need time to develop.

Tell kender I'm trying to be serious here. :-p

Reply


anonymous March 13 2009, 21:20:21 UTC
(Ameryll here, but at work, so not bothering to log in.)

I think that you do need to know someone to really love them for good, but I think love at first sight is a bit misleading. Its not necessarily their looks that get you. Sometimes its something they do when you first meet them. That doesn't mean that they're meant for you but it might. (Like someone sees you're having a bad day when other kids pick on you and intentionally compliments you on whatever they were picking on, or something)

But my more generally philosophy on love is that you have to be friends first and foremost. It'll hurt more if it doesn't work out, but if you're friends you'll have things to do together long after the romance wears off.

And my boy says love is 1 part tenderness and 2 parts silliness.

(and love at first sight came from medieval literature where they thought that love struck you through your eyes, bypassed your brain and went directly to your heart)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up