Strange essay by Errol Morris recounting his brief tenure as a Princeton grad student under Kuhn:
I asked him, “If paradigms are really incommensurable, how is history of science possible? Wouldn’t we be merely interpreting the past in the light of the present? Wouldn’t the past be inaccessible to us? Wouldn’t it be ‘incommensurable?’ ” [8
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Some funny and flippant points well made in both, but very little attempt actually to outline Kuhn's or Kripke's ideas, I think. My reductive take on Morris's work has always been that he's smug d!ck, who does actually secretly think he has God's Eye View...
Reply
Reply
What we’re seeing here is not a rejection of his views; it’s a rejection of a caricature of his view. He never believed in any sort of relativism that says there is no truth other than the point of view people take on it. He believed very much in truth, but he also knew that understanding what it is to be true is much more complicated than it might first appear.
I don't understand Kuhn very well yet, but I think I understand him well enough to know that cries of "relativism" etc. (whatever a person means when he/she says it) are horseshit.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment