duality

[slithead]

On a low level, one has to believe either that suffering is redemptive, or it is to be avoided at all costs. Some people will initially say that both are true, but that's really avoiding the question. Knowing that I'm in the latter category may help explain why I have problems understanding those in the former, and why I might come off as cold to

Comments

[komoriblue]

I don't know... There are many paths to redemption, and suffering is just one. And sometimes suffering serves no purpose what-so-ever. Sometimes it is necessary, and trying to avoid it leads to greater problems. I wouldn't attach any higher purpose to it, though. Sometimes happiness is best avoided, too.

I guess I can't decide if humans are animals or not. I don't feel like animals can really be expected to hold themselves accountable for their actions. And I meet so many people who seem incapable of accepting accountability. I'm pretty sure it is something humans have to learn/be taught. Maybe it's just wishful thinking/arrogance on my part, because I do always make every attempt to hold myself accountable.

[vghoul]

I agree with Amy that suffering in and of itself is meaningless one way or the other. I think suffering has the POTENTIAL to be redemptive, in the right hands. I've always erred on its side, often to my own detriment. However, I still think avoidance often is at the root of preventing necessary change, both on the personal and social levels, and therefore I view it with skepticism and distaste.