Ron Paul sucks

Oct 19, 2011 18:33

image Click to view



Let's go over everything wrong with this in order, shall we?

1. Dr. Ron Paul, more than 4,000 babies delivered, a man of faith, committed to protecting life. Except by "protecting life" he actually means "banning abortion," which has nothing to do with improving health care or saving lives, and in fact is not correlated with lower abortion ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 22

lux_roark October 19 2011, 23:44:06 UTC
3. I didn't realize my 5 week old fetus could survive on it's own. Amazing how much science has advanced in the past 6 years!

Reply


eyelid October 19 2011, 23:44:26 UTC
Except by "protecting life" he actually means "banning abortion," which has nothing to do with improving health care or saving lives,

Isn't Ron Paul the one who says people should just be left to die if they can't pay for medical care?

Why didn't Dr. Ron Paul speak up and turn these reprobates over to the proper authorities?

or, you know, TAKE THE BABY OUT OF THE BUCKET? Because if _I_ saw a baby in a bucket crying, I would TAKE IT OUT and CARE FOR IT.

Classic lifer: the baby in the bucket is not my problem.

The whole idea of RON PAUL being all teary-eyed over how much we owe babies is hilarious. Ron Paul wouldn't pay to care for even a fraction of one baby.

Reply

nothingmuch October 19 2011, 23:50:20 UTC
Isn't Ron Paul the one who says people should just be left to die if they can't pay for medical care?

YEP! lolol

Reply

aequanoctis October 19 2011, 23:54:50 UTC
Okay, so baby=OMGPRECIOUSGIFT, unless of course the parents don't have insurance?

PROTECT LIFE!

Reply

nothingmuch October 20 2011, 00:02:56 UTC
Bucket Baby should have been saved! They were aborting in a hospital! They obviously had insurance!!

But if some immigrant sneaks in to our American ER with one a them gotdamn Medicaid anchor fetuses, kick that sumbitch out in the cold! OUR TAX DOLLAZ!

Reply


scorpi084 October 20 2011, 00:22:00 UTC
So wait, Ron Paul. You walked into a room, saw people breaking the law by putting a baby into a bucket who you believed was alive, and you WALKED OUT? Without taking the baby? And we're the ones who don't value life? DO YOU EVEN HEAR YOURSELF? You are a fucking psycho, go get yourself some medical attention. Lord knows you can probably afford it.

Reply

eyelid October 20 2011, 14:24:10 UTC
See that's what I'm saying. I can't believe that doesn't jump out at people. "I saw a baby dying in a bucket.... and I DID NOTHING. I'm so pro-life." WHUT

Reply

fatpie42 October 20 2011, 17:52:24 UTC
He allowed the baby the liberty to die. He only cares about it while it's still in the womb. :S

Reply


Pee Ess scorpi084 October 20 2011, 00:30:07 UTC
EXACTLY: who are WE to decide? WE are not the one who is pregnant! WE are not the one who will have to watch what we eat, avoid alcohol & smoke, watch what medicines we take, gain 25 pounds in 9 months, throw up every day, risk preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, hyperemesis, and so on!

I think "death" belongs on this list.

Reply

Re: Pee Ess nothingmuch October 20 2011, 00:33:02 UTC
ok I added it

Reply


sweetchild92 October 20 2011, 03:58:08 UTC
I love how his libertarianism is KEEP GOVERNMENT AWAY FROM EVERYTHING*

*except uteruses (and probably guns)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up