Love is a natural extension of complete knowledge.

Feb 26, 2006 00:10

This is something really weird I never intended to write...

Love is a natural extension of complete knowledge. )

essay, love, writing, quote

Leave a comment

Comments 7

(The comment has been removed)

slytherin_heart February 27 2006, 03:57:15 UTC
I don't believe love is a decision, per se. I believe that love is a realization you come to. I mean, if you can say that you've just fallen in love, then it's probably not love. In my experience, it's not some huge event (at the time) it's a slower process that you don't necessarily realize is happening at the time...

I do believe that, in some circumstances, it can be one giant climactic ordeal, but not always.

And my mommy uninstalled Y!M! It's very sad! I'm stuck with just AIM and an old, outdated MSN...

~Jamie

Reply


cuznhottie February 26 2006, 22:46:21 UTC
I disagree that you can know a person completely. You can never know a person completely, no matter if you spend a lifetime with them. Maybe, and I stress the maybe, if you spend multiple lifetimes with them you might be able to get in their head and come close to knowing them completely.
Loving a person is loving the hidden spaces of their mind and soul, but it's also loving the admirable things they do, as well as their known faults. It's much more complicated, and there are different types of love. True love, which is so rare, never fades. You may grow apart from who you love, but you'd never stop loving them.
I also disagree that you can love a person if you know all the reasons of their being. Some people can, but some people couldn't. There is true evil in the world, people who would kill their parents just because of a whim. Those are the people that I doubt many people could find to love, no matter if they knew all the reasons for their actions or not.

Reply

slytherin_heart February 28 2006, 04:35:06 UTC
I disagree that you can know a person completely. You can never know a person completely, no matter if you spend a lifetime with them. Maybe, and I stress the maybe, if you spend multiple lifetimes with them you might be able to get in their head and come close to knowing them completely.

I believe that it's possible to know someone more completely than they know themselves. I worded it awkwardly when I said 'completely' because that would imply a knowledge of past, present, and future. If someone lets you in, though, truly takes down all of their barriers/walls and invites you to know them better than they know themself, that, to me, is love.

Loving a person is loving the hidden spaces of their mind and soul, but it's also loving the admirable things they do, as well as their known faults. It's much more complicated, and there are different types of love. True love, which is so rare, never fades. You may grow apart from who you love, but you'd never stop loving them.I'm not speaking only of the kind of True Love you are, because I ( ... )

Reply

cuznhottie February 28 2006, 15:38:53 UTC
Ah, then I agree that you can know a person better than they know themselves, but only in certain respects. You can never really be sure what a person is thinking. I also agree that taking down barriers helps to love someone, but if they do that, it doesn't mean that you'll automatically love them ( ... )

Reply

slytherin_heart March 1 2006, 05:45:04 UTC
I doubt there's a point in discussing this very much further, as neither of us is going to change their mind from simple discussion (I believe that experience can change opinions on almost anything).

I didn't miss the part where you said that not all people would be able to love them, I just disagree with it and felt that the rest of my response addressed that fairly enough.

I think lots of people have firm views on stuff like this, but few people ever sit down and discuss it (so to speak).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up