Seriously. Because mandating maternity leave and care isn't pretty much a necessity for allowing women an equal place in the workforce, keeping them alive, or anything. I think we need more public rants about how much the Republicans hate mothers.
And remember, the GOP is concerned about how their image is being sullied by lone nutjobs. Like, apparently, most of the party.
And just where is the logic? [OK, I know that the answer is NOT HERE. But I'm gonna write it out anyway.] We certainly don't want to cover abortion. But we don't want to cover maternity care, because we *certainly* want "will this bankrupt me?" to be the deciding factor for women trying to decide whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
And all these white male scholars saying: Well, she shouldn’t have a baby if she can’t feed him. But she shouldn’t have an abortion either, She should just know better. You see, knowledge is power Yeah, but power is money and Money’s what matters.
See, that's massively disgusting. My first thought was to say "Well, since Sen. Stabenow doesn't need treatments for prostate or testicular cancer, should we stop covering that, too?"
Well see, they don't take too kindly to women not having babies. That's the only reason Palin was chosen over me last year. If I was a man it'd be fine. The fact that I'm married and I stay at home and bake cakes is a good start though.
Ovarian cancer next on his list? Then cervical? Then therapy for rape victims? Because we all know that Nice White Girls who Do The Right Thing don't get raped and neither do guys. So really, there's a big budget slash right there.
Well, y'know, if you're going to charge alleged rape victims for the kit to prove it, a la Sarah the Former Governor's world, shouldn't they pay for their therapy? If you're icky, it's because God didn't love you enough to protect, and that's your own fault, remember.
Comments 17
Reply
And remember, the GOP is concerned about how their image is being sullied by lone nutjobs. Like, apparently, most of the party.
Reply
And just where is the logic? [OK, I know that the answer is NOT HERE. But I'm gonna write it out anyway.] We certainly don't want to cover abortion. But we don't want to cover maternity care, because we *certainly* want "will this bankrupt me?" to be the deciding factor for women trying to decide whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
And all these white male scholars saying:
Well, she shouldn’t have a baby if she can’t feed him.
But she shouldn’t have an abortion either,
She should just know better.
You see, knowledge is power
Yeah, but power is money and
Money’s what matters.
Reply
My sister at one time actually had insurance that would cover Viagra, but not birth control.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't even.
I ACCIDENTALLY THE WHOLE THING.
(When baffled, I channel my inner /b/tard. I find it is the only thing that helps.)
Have a cat macro.
( ... )
Reply
And, yeah, it boggles the rational mind. My 30-year-old-kneejerk-reactionary conservatism, let me show you it.
Reply
GAH. WHARRRRBARLGE!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment