Agree re: wand, although I still haven't worked ALL of it out. I re-read HBP once the conversation with Ollivander happened because I was trying to figure out what exactly constituted overpowering to take control of the wand. Also agree that V thought Snape had control because he assumed D had his wand still when he died (especially since he was buried with it).
Has it not appeared because Snape isn't really dead? Surely a wizard who has survived in Voldemort's presence for years, not to mention being skilled in the art of potions, would be prepared for an attack by Nagini?
Arthur Weasley had been saved, two years prior, from the same kind of venom. His wounds, too, bled profusely, but he survived.
Yes.... sounds like fandom will be alive and well....
I am latching hold of the "Snape had already vaccinated himself against Nagini's venom" thought, am adding it to the death confirmation 19 years later, and am - in the spirit of my ship - throwing out the fact that Ron and Hermione's oldest child was born 8 years after DH wraps up. I'll give them a few years to get married and get careers established - but 8 years? I do not think Ronald Weasley would wait that long, especially after Harry and Ginny already had a child. So what was going on in those 8 years, 8 years when Severus was theoretically alive? *crosses fingers and finds HG/SS possibilities in canon*
Comments 5
Has it not appeared because Snape isn't really dead? Surely a wizard who has survived in Voldemort's presence for years, not to mention being skilled in the art of potions, would be prepared for an attack by Nagini?
Arthur Weasley had been saved, two years prior, from the same kind of venom. His wounds, too, bled profusely, but he survived.
Yes.... sounds like fandom will be alive and well....
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment