OK this

[snixen]

is messed up.

Read this article:

http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature5/

Then realize it was written in October, 2004.

If National Geographic could see this scenario, why couldn't FEMA?

Thanks to my pal, Bri.

Comments

[laughingimp]

And creepy that their hypothetical scenario figured on 80% of the city getting flooded, which is exactly what happened.

Cripes

[curlygirl0512]

Its amazing how far the politicos have their collective heads up their asses... dems and repos alike. People wont listen... Warnings have been issued for years about the outerbanks of NC, about the bayous, the everglades... but the enviros are almost always shown as fanatical lunatics standing in the way of progress...

ugh.

[dazzleland]

Amazing...

I'm asking that writer for the lottery numbers.