Nov 22, 2007 14:18
I'm all for the Goo Goo Dolls paying the halftime show at whatever football game on TV that I am being forced to watch. But, the Goo Goo Dolls and Ballet do not mix. So, who had the bright idea to combine ballet/modern dancers with a live Goo Goo Dolls performance? And what in the name of all that is good was that person on?
Leave a comment
Comments 14
Your new layout, on the other hand, is something I heartily approve of. HURRAH WEAKERTHANS! (Where did you get it, incidentally? I think my current layout is picketing with the writers' guild, and I'd kind of like to replace the poor dear. I LOVED THAT THING SO MUCH, YOU HAVE NO IDEA, AND NOW IT IS JUST REFUSING TO WORK? I am saddened.) Also, I love how instead of just moving on to a new journal like you normally do annually, you COMPLETELY PURGED THIS ONE and changed the layout. Very clever, I was completely fooled ( ... )
Reply
Ballet = Fail at life. End of discussion. John Rzeznik is nearly forty-two and does not fail at life. Ipso ergo, ballet + The Goo Goo Dolls = Grumpy!Me. Or, Grumpierthanusual!Me.
My Thanksgiving made Waterloo and Stalingrad look like success stories. I had to babysit two horribly annoying children (AND WAS NOT PAID FOR IT), nearly commited (a) suicide and (b) several Class A Felonies. I dealt with a mother who is suffering from delusions of grandeur and choosing computerized Chess challengers over real ones, and go9t nothing done on Political Science. By the way, I am emailing you the latest version now.
Reply
Reply
ALSO, this is the quickest response I have ever received to anything, and I thought you'd like to know. Congratulations, my eager little werewolf!
And did you really have to burst my delusions about your layout-maker's bodaciousness? No, don't answer that, because the proper answer is NO YOU DID NOT! Thanks for ruthlessly crushing me ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment