(Untitled)

[solid_squid]

OK, I know I should have been uploading these more regularly, but... uh... I couldn't be arsed to be honest. I have been keeping things up to date at my conceptart.org sketchbook though, and I'll  upload the rest here at the weekend

Comments

PBT

[tyciol]

Thank you for your concern. I am (sadly) already aware of my presence on that tracker, and the role of which it, WFI, AZ and PJ all had in putting pressure on LJ which caused the strikethrough. I do not and never have had a single thing in my journal or in my interests which violates LJ's terms of service. The reason they placed me on that was because one of the thousand+ communities I joined happened to be one they disagreed with and due to my actually participating and not lurking, was made a moderator, which apparently makes you an 'activist' or something like that. Anyway I've already requested multiple times they take it down, they haven't (nor will even display the requests), so there's really nothing more I can do.

Thanks for your interest.

Re: PBT

[solid_squid]

yeah, the majority of the links on their page are similar cases to yours actually. One case was someone who had *been* abused as a child, so had it mentioned on their profile because they were interested in discussing the subject and ways of stopping it.

Someone actually found out that all they did was search for certain strings on google and report any journals that showed up for them, without checking the content. I can't remember where the article was, but it made a lot of sense when they showed the correlation between the list of phrases and the mistakes that the group have made with reporting

Re: PBT

[tyciol]

I wouldn't presume they search that halfhazardly. Apparently they only reported communities and people who were members of those communities. People who were banned solely upon keywords in their interest list seems to have been an idea by LJ itself, or so it seems or something. Which they apologized for and reinstated and stuff.