movie pans, blame the audience. check.

Nov 24, 2009 14:08

dear Paul,

you had me until the last paragraph. you and Megan Fox must hang out a lot.

no love,

me.

Leave a comment

Comments 12

arthurfrdent November 24 2009, 22:37:02 UTC
the customer has changed, and so you must change too. ID10T. OI. Really, it is as much dilution of choices as anything. If I can watch a cutting edge anime on the net, and you can get a 5 minute satire sent to your iPhone, and tivo is quietly queing up something else...

I think a lot of people are longing for what never was. How many people saw those movies in the 70's? Were they successful, really? Revisionist history, if you ask me...

Reply

somedaybitch November 24 2009, 22:54:31 UTC
i agree that to some degree it's a bit of revisionist history/nostalgia, but not, imho, for the most part. emmocv.

definitions of "successful" aside, there were less films released then, which certainly contributed to the "event-ness" of film and film viewing. films cost less to see - in adjusted dollars - so more people went more often i think; but also, because there were fewer films, and most were in "pretty good" and up categories, it quantitatively feels like films from then were better.

absent doing studies to account for per capita adjustments in population vs viewing audience size, and ROI against costs, i think he's in safe territory with his generalization.

my problem with his last paragraph in particular, and with dumbasses like Ms Fox - and elistist Hollywood - in general, is the utter refusal to acknowledge that their films could simply just suck, or, to be fair, that the subject matter could have too narrow an appeal. instead, they just blame "middle America" for being too obtuse/uneducated/bourgeois/white/close- ( ... )

Reply

arthurfrdent November 24 2009, 23:23:13 UTC
oh, yeah, much with the elitest... funnily for MFox mostly the people that watch her stuff, are the middle america ones, anywya, for what little that definition means in truth...

IMHO the thing with the taking of responsibility is all about how they feel that we should just shut up and fork over the dough, since middle America is too stupid to know what's good for it. :shrug:

Reply

somedaybitch November 25 2009, 03:21:44 UTC
IMHO the thing with the taking of responsibility is all about how they feel that we should just shut up and fork over the dough, since middle America is too stupid to know what's good for it. :shrug:

yep, which is exactly why middle America tells Hollywood exactly what it can do with its elitist bullshit but *not* forking over cash. dumb lot, them.

spook just told me, in a related aside, that Modern Warfare 2 just made 301 MILLION dollars in 24 hours.

note to Hollywood: provide the public what they want and they will THROW money at you.

Reply


lem0nb0mbs November 25 2009, 05:59:37 UTC
There's nothing like putting the finishing touch on an interview by slapping the audience/readers in the face.

Reply

somedaybitch December 8 2009, 03:33:15 UTC
lol. i know, right?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up