And they say Humanities students never have any fun...netgothOctober 18 2006, 21:02:45 UTC
Ah, Victorian memento mori. Yep, an interesting cultural anomaly, that is. Here's another side note fo the picture at the top - the reason the child's eyes look so strange is because (I'd be willing to bet good money) they're painted to look as if they are open. Real eyes roll back/film over far too quickly to make a viable image from them. For example: http://www.sleepingbeauty2.com/pages/image%20pages/64.html... )
Re: And they say Humanities students never have any fun...spprsOctober 20 2006, 16:22:24 UTC
Very cool. Dig the links too. I have some of Witkin images in my screensaver at home.
I didn't realize they painted the eyes. They were apparently pretty good at it. I wonder if anyone at the time played with glass or wooden eyes for the... um... riper subjects.
Something else to consider re: photographing children, besides the practical difficulties would be cost and demand. Depending on the decade and location (Wichita 1860 vs. New York 1890), finding/affording a portrait photographer wasn't exactly comparable to running down to Olan Mills. Given the life expectancy of children as well, when the kid croaked, it was probably a now or never situation for most families to get their first and last memento of the kid.
"Honey, let's take young Aloysius down to Mr. Brady for some wallet shots." "Fuck that, dear, I ain't paying two bits for a blurry shot. Why don't we wait a couple months and do it when he croaks from the consumption. Hell for two bits, we can buy a new tenament building!"
This is old news to Careena Who Is Obsessed With The Victorian Era. It really makes perfect sense, if you think about it...you have a kid for eight years, but it costs the equivalent of a week's wages to get that kid's picture taken, you only decide to get it done once they're dead and you won't have any more chances.
You should try subscribing to the LJ community "DarkVictoria" for a few weeks...someone's post mortem photo gets posted there about as often as a personals site. It's a great community.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
No, I don't know why I wrote fo. 'Fo sho, I need more caffiene, tho'.
Reply
I didn't realize they painted the eyes. They were apparently pretty good at it. I wonder if anyone at the time played with glass or wooden eyes for the... um... riper subjects.
Something else to consider re: photographing children, besides the practical difficulties would be cost and demand. Depending on the decade and location (Wichita 1860 vs. New York 1890), finding/affording a portrait photographer wasn't exactly comparable to running down to Olan Mills. Given the life expectancy of children as well, when the kid croaked, it was probably a now or never situation for most families to get their first and last memento of the kid.
"Honey, let's take young Aloysius down to Mr. Brady for some wallet shots."
"Fuck that, dear, I ain't paying two bits for a blurry shot. Why don't we wait a couple months and do it when he croaks from the consumption. Hell for two bits, we can buy a new tenament building!"
Reply
Reply
Reply
They must of used Dick Greco's rendering as a "pole" so he could be standing upright like that - cuz I didn't see model...
Reply
You should try subscribing to the LJ community "DarkVictoria" for a few weeks...someone's post mortem photo gets posted there about as often as a personals site. It's a great community.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment