I was just reading through my friends page and came across the latest offering from Bad Astronomy, 'Scientists are...' (
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/12/04/search_engine_bias_scientists_are.html). In this article Phil Plait is worrying about the bad rep scientists seem to have via Google search autocomplete
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
BTW, "tech support is it a toaster" and Doctors are arrogant, stupid, rude, overpaid, and dangerous. OTOH, Nurse are angels and heroes (you get overpaid, annoying, and fat further down).
Reply
'Is it a toaster' I wonder what leads to that question being asked!
Reply
At least there's that! Really, this sentence is pure gold.
I don't think this kind of test reflects anything at all in reality, so I wouldn't worry too much about it. And the way I see it, scientist are usually perceived more favorably than many other groups. Even though it's not uncommon for scientists to detract from other groups' merit; I can't count (ha!) how many times I've heard from scientists that humanists are just people too stupid to comprehend math.
Reply
I guess that was part of my point, that this isn't really a helpful measure of opinion and it's not particularly helpful to be drawing attention in this way.
And yes, I've heard the attitude that non-scientists can't understand far too many times for comfort too, which really makes me feel kind of sad!
Certainly in the UK scientists occupy quite a privileged position in society. An ipsos mori poll carried out a couple of years ago says that although people don't think they know much about what scientists do, they still trust them to be working for the betterment of society. Our government too wants to be seen as supporting science and technology, as recently shown in a budget speech.
Reply
Leave a comment