On the Archer case, his perjury in 1987 got him a award of compensation for libel to the tune of £500,000, which he did not deserve because the libel was in fact true. He therefore deserved to be punished every bit as much as someone who simply stole £500,000, plus extra for the damage to other people caused by his lie (the editor who had printed the story was sacked, and died before Archer's perjury was revealed). I bet he is a bit coy about this in his diaries.
I agree that what Archer did was unconscionable, he abused his position and popularity and lied outright in court about an issue he himself had raised. Mockery of justice it was.
I had to stop reading LMM's journals, she was SO unhappy and it made me incredibly sad. I kind of want to read that, but I probably won't. Not now, anyway. Weird to hear that she might have dramatized all the Herman Leard stuff.
Comments 5
On a happier note, I have added you on Goodreads!
Reply
Reply
Reply
I also haven't made it through one of his novels, though I haven't really tried.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment