"When fewer people are involved, then each individual action, regardless of how small, is even deeper and more meaningful than before, as meaning and depth themselves are relative concepts."
Yet with a greater amount of people the meaningfulness is lost in a wave of distrust and anger. Which triggers a more difficult road of control, thereby losing the ability to act as oneself usually could. >>But there is control. You can cut off each person you don't trust. And then you can be yourself.
And even in a small group, there a sense of control...some things that hold no fredom, no hope or ones individuality cannot be expressed. >>Then that person who "one" refers to shouldn't be in the group. Freedom, hope, and individuality are concepts which every human being has a right to, and when lost, the human being should leave.
*shrugs* Perhaps this is why most groups fail...who knows? >>Quit trying to say things without saying them.
~> Not necessarily. If you cut off each person you don't trust, just because they said something that you don't agree with or something you don't trust about the person's judgement, may make more an enemy out of a valuable friend. You cannot be yourself when you just made enemies out of friends
( ... )
Comments 5
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
>>But there is control. You can cut off each person you don't trust. And then you can be yourself.
And even in a small group, there a sense of control...some things that hold no fredom, no hope or ones individuality cannot be expressed.
>>Then that person who "one" refers to shouldn't be in the group. Freedom, hope, and individuality are concepts which every human being has a right to, and when lost, the human being should leave.
*shrugs* Perhaps this is why most groups fail...who knows?
>>Quit trying to say things without saying them.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment