Roe V. Wade

Nov 29, 2005 19:46

Yep, i'm gonna touch it. I haven't wrote anything in a while, and thats mainly b/c i haven't been paying attention to the news. I've lately been...well, i guess depressed is the best way to put it, with the news. When we show incredibly biased things on the news all the time, not having many women or minorites in key positions, it's a step ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

I forgot to put the link steppinrazor25 November 29 2005, 17:05:42 UTC

punkymunky21 November 30 2005, 06:50:41 UTC
British TV has another advantage too... during election season, rather than politicians buying as much time as possible, they're granted a limited amount of time to broadcast ads on TV for free and they can't buy more. That way you know each candidate is at least getting their fair shake at showing their opinion.

You're totally right that a man shouldn't have a say in abortions. But I'll take it one step further. You say a man shouldn't have a say because it's not his body. I agree. Well, women shouldn't have a say either. The only person that should have a say is a woman, singular. It's her fucking body, not every womans, right? So why should any other woman get a say about what any singular woman does in regards to her own body? It should be up to the individual ( ... )

Reply


Flyers steppinrazor25 December 1 2005, 16:01:40 UTC
Nah man, the mood and music where flyers, the name was roe v. wade.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up