I just received the American Physical Society's monthly newsletter, APS News. In the "Letters" section, they published a letter entitled "Nothing Wrong with Fewer Women Physicists" by someone names Jeffery Winkler from Hanford, CA. Winkler was evidently "shocked" by a February article about how encouraging women to pursue careers in physics is a
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
(also, frothy-mouthed rage.)
Reply
Reply
Newt
Reply
Reply
I wish I could promise you that the letter absolutely didn't represent the views of anyone in physics, but the plain fact is that there are cranks in every field of human endeavor. The fact that this guy is a crank but not a physicist does not mean that there are no cranks who ARE physicists. Somewhere in the mail and editorial offices of the APS, an error was made here, but it was (probably) an error made with good intent. "Is there anything we can do to make people read the editorial page?" In defense of the mail-opening staff, the distinction between real and crank mail can be quite subtle, and if the piles of mail are big enough, the only way to get through it in the time alotted is to fall back on a broader system of pattern ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I was pleased to read the letter a year or so back from Mudd about the steps they've taken to encourage women to study computer science, and just how effective that has been -- without watering down the curriculum at all.
A response more along the lines of "Here's how we do it at Alma, and our enrollment of women physics majors has become x% up from
Reply
It wouldn't be watering down a curriculum to include *actual* introductory courses that don't assume the students already have a decade of programming experience.
Reply
Leave a comment