Hmph. I'm having trouble getting past the fact that he's referring to his business as a "non-tipping model" when in fact what it is is a "forced tipping model." (I get that there may be legitimate legal reasons why a business needs to apportion the bill using a tip model, but the fact remains that the result is not that I DON'T tip but that I am FORCED to tip, so it seems like the correct neutral term would be "fixed tip".) I mean
( ... )
Are all non-all-inclusive prices equally pernicious, or is there something in particular about tips?
I would really rather see advertised prices be accurate, too. But I think that a fixed-size surcharge for table service is strictly better than tipping, by quite a bit, for the reasons described. Also, if most restaurants had a similar size, it would make a stepping stone to folding it in to all-in prices.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
I would really rather see advertised prices be accurate, too. But I think that a fixed-size surcharge for table service is strictly better than tipping, by quite a bit, for the reasons described. Also, if most restaurants had a similar size, it would make a stepping stone to folding it in to all-in prices.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment