Honestly, sit her down and try to explain it so she can cope. Going in behind his back is taking away his autonomy and ability to do what he wants or deal with it in his own way. (My answer might be different were he a child, but since he's not
( ... )
Yeah, I have kept track of all James blood kin, and all the information is availible to him, and has been since he was seven. When he was seven before we adopted him there was a bonding assesment done because his parents contested the adoption. I was leaning against the wall adjoining the room he had his private interview in, resting my eyes and of course I could hear every word. When asked what the best thing about living with his parents was, he replied nothing in a small cold voice, it was chilling, he has not moved much past there with regard to his parents. Hacking his account is cheap and sleazy solution, the problem does not really rise to this level of interference.
Wife has problem, wife must deal with own problem. Husband have problem, which is irritation over wife problem; husband deal with own problem irritation. Son maybe not have problem, Ugg not know. Son now peer, not child.
No on the hacking. And I'd say try and explain it to your wife as best you can. It's your son's issues to deal with ultimately, but I can totally understand wanting to DO something about it all.
Comments 6
Reply
Hard on my wife though.
Be well.
Reply
Vote Ugg!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Good luck.
Reply
Leave a comment