Personal political view below, don't be hatin'.

[suge]

Hey guys. I'm putting together a HUGE picspam for tomorrow (proving I've actually been doing something for the past month).

But, watch this. I love the anchor.

Click to view

This is what we need to ask ourselves: If it's wrong, do we punish people for it and how far do we take the punishment legally.

Comments

[izelmecatl]

It's kinda funny how by the end of the clip, one could tell the bishop was pulling answers out of his ass.

Nice.

[suge]

Totally. (Wow, that sounds smart.)
But, yes, I almost felt sorry for him. Almost.

[suge]

btw, i never fixed that code for you. i didn't get any email - do you still want me too?
*is in the middle of re-coding her journal*

[izelmecatl]

Oh shi-! Sorry for the late reply!!! If you still want and have time, I'll send you the code in a pm, last time I tried, and then it told me it was too big (the messege) So that's why I sent it through e-mail. Anyway, I'll try again.

It's just to make the header fit and for the space below the header to be smaller.
I'll send it right now.

Thank you!

[wicked_seraph]

While I agree with the anchor wholeheartedly, I don't like how he went about this - it seemed like he was attacking the bishop. Almost every time the bishop tried to speak, the anchor would immediately override him. He would ask the bishop how the law should work, but as soon as the bishop tried to consider it and answer, the anchor berated him, sugaring his speech with "Your Excellency" to make him seem more polite. No matter how much the anchor may have disagreed with him, nevertheless the bishop was INVITED to come and speak, not to be publicly humiliated and denounced :/

That being said, I appreciate you posting this - it was quite interesting to watch :]

[suge]

I can see your point. However I felt the bishop was talking in circles. Although the anchor did interrupt him several times more than necessary, I don't think it took away from what the bishop would have said. His argument wasn't very strong, his points were redundant and sometimes self-contradictory... the anchor's interruption didn't bother me since I was already fed up with what the bishop was saying (not only because I disagree with it but also because I thought he badly represented his masses.) And it's MSNBC, it's liberal, the bishop would have expected strong opposition to his viewpoints... but this is all just me talking.

No prob, sometimes youtube provides something interesting.