Firefox 2.0 and IE 7.0

Oct 26, 2006 22:24

Well just downloaded them both and have now had a little fiddle and thought I should inflict what I have found on others ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

diecse October 26 2006, 21:54:10 UTC
Interesting one, nice to hear from someone who has actually used them both.

The tech support guys at work sent around an email the other day suggesting we don't install IE7, because it apparently breaks our CRM (customer relationship management, i.e. sales) software. Obviously this is a bad thing.

I have heard reports of many websites being displayed incorrectly in IE7, but I've also heard several other people who haven't had such problems.

Of course, those of us who don't run Windows don't get too much of a choice either way :-)

Rob
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6

Reply


filius_lupi October 26 2006, 22:22:18 UTC
it does not like the word spelt

Shocking! Firefox really should know more about old-fashioned, rare-ish forms of flour!

t seems to be very good, and brings up a good list of alternatives to the misspelt words

Like "misspelled" for "misspelt"? "To spell" is a regular weak verb, so you will certainly find "spelt" in the full version of the OED, only it will be noted as an archaism, like spelling "pressed" as "prest". While quite correct, it's therefore officially obsolete, which I disagree with completely. But then I spell mediæval correctly too... I'm glad someone is erring on the side of irregularity and strength - the weak verb is scarily displacing the strong all too quickly at present!
Remember: present tense - I sing; preterite - I sang; past participle - sung. It's not complicated!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up