Ummmmmmmmmm
anonymous
February 19 2009, 03:35:32 UTC
I followed the link and looked around that site trying to find the actual wording of the proposed law amendment that they are objecting to. I found plenty of rhetoric about it infringes on peoples rights and freedoms and how ISP's already do block or take down sites that they think might infringe on copyright law
( ... )
Re: UmmmmmmmmmmadrexiaFebruary 20 2009, 05:30:09 UTC
Well for one, the "repeat infringer" is someone who has been _accused_ of copyright violation multiple times, as opposed to someone who has been _convicted_ of copyright infringement. Can you see how that might be abused? I certainly can.
Comments 5
Reply
Reply
As far as precedents go, it's appalling (in addition to being vaguely appalling in its substance anyway).
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment