In the essay “Japan’s Kamikaze Pilots and Contemporary Suicide Bombers: War and Terror” by Yuki Tanaka, he talks about kamikaze pilots. He explains why someone might be a kamikaze pilot, and the difference between suicide bombers and kamikaze pilots.
Tanaka’s tone is very neutral. There was no point I found him to be bias or even persuasive. He
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
I also agree with you that Tanaka wanted to make it clear that kamikaze pilots did not aim to harm civilians, unlike the contemporary suicide bombers. This is an important fact that the audience must understand.
To answer your question: Never. I could not rationalize my own suicide. To me there is no pride in killing yourself to strike fear into your enemy. Willingly being involved the army is different: you fight for what is right, or what you and your country believe in. Kamikaze or suicide was designed to scare the enemy into a defensive state, leaving them more vulnerable. I find Kamikaze and suicide to be barbaric and void of all rational strategy.
Reply
Was “completely insane” hyperbole, or do you really think people willing to die for a cause are mentally deficient? Although I do not know if I have the courage, I would like to think there are things in this world I am willing to die for. And at least in theory, there are things in this life worth killing to protect. But actually doing it, or being resolute to do so, must change you. And as jeeptrick points out doing so simply to put your enemy in a defensive position is quite a mental leap for me as well.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment