(Untitled)

Sep 29, 2006 16:13

Interesting.

Remember, if you disagree with what he has to say, you didn't have to read it. :P

Leave a comment

Comments 5

wilddyingsunset September 29 2006, 21:19:12 UTC
Isn't it funny that if one disagrees that they have to first read it to figure out what they agree or disagree with?

goofy.

I didn't read it. =P

Reply

tantallus September 29 2006, 21:21:15 UTC
The point was that if you disagree there is no reason to comment on your disagreements... as you had no reason to read it in the first place. Hell, if you agree with what he has to say remember that you didn't have to read it either. :P

Reply

wilddyingsunset September 29 2006, 21:22:39 UTC
I normally don't do the political thing in journals...I'm just being a smart ass about the fact that you can't disagree UNTIL you read it. =P

Reply


many_moons September 29 2006, 22:30:23 UTC
I'm not sure if I can comment or not. Your whole thing about disagreeing confuses me. :(

Reply

tantallus September 30 2006, 02:56:07 UTC
Bah, I'll try to be less confusing from now on. Even I'm confused when I re-read this. :(

Reply


Leave a comment

Up