Particles, energy, Physics and spirituality...

Sep 15, 2008 12:03

i'm not entirely sure how to start this one.
obviously, the LHC media coverage has given me a chance to do a bit of layman physics research and to (in my own head at least) unify my beliefs once and for all.
cut for bad science, Back to the drawing board. )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

gleef September 15 2008, 13:24:11 UTC
You might find it interesting to check out some of the newer models of universe creation, such as Brane Collisions or Chaotic/Eternal Inflation.

Under the "traditional" Big Bang model, there was just one big bang we know about, and the universe will either grow until heat death, or collapse into a Big Crunch (which might result in another Big Bang).

Under some of the other plausible models, new universes could be being created all the time.

Reply

renfield286 September 15 2008, 14:01:51 UTC
yeah, i was using "big bang" as a genral term for begging theory.

my main point is about energy in all things and the godspark though.

-=R286=-

Reply


ziggysinamerica September 15 2008, 15:04:11 UTC
when you get down to the sub atomic level, all matter is energy

That's not really true...

Reply

sammhain September 15 2008, 21:36:09 UTC
beat me to it

Reply

renfield286 September 16 2008, 06:10:19 UTC
no?
this is what i understood of it, in that case i have been misinfomred.

Reply

ziggysinamerica September 16 2008, 06:31:14 UTC
yeah, there's all sorts of subatomic particles. It's organized for a bit but then it gets kind of messy.

Also, energy can't imprint anything on itself because it's constantly moving. If it did it would cease to be energy and become matter.

Your fundamental flaw is that spiritual energy is completely different than energy as defined by physics, and you really can't use one to explain or elaborate on the other.

Reply


wibbble September 15 2008, 21:40:48 UTC
I tried to read this, but the bad science and bad spelling was too much for me to take.

Reply

renfield286 September 16 2008, 06:19:39 UTC
Wow, productive and informative.

Seriously. What point has the bad spelling?

(bad science i will give you)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up