"when it comes to a point at which youre the only one disagreeing, there IS something awry. there IS something wrong. don't talk about the fucking "general masses" and "conformity" and shit, though ive not heard you say much about it other than "not understanding." when youre the only one agreeing with yourself, something is wrong, something needs correction. but you refuse to realize that. fucking refuse. only the slightest changes need to be made, but you refuse. that is not individuality. that is not making you seem 'tough.' that is arrogance. selfish, crude arrogance."
you generalize situations dangerously. this cannot be applied to all circumstances at all. it's thinking like this that prevents progress in society.
you claim that i generalize situations, yet this was a personal, strictly person-to-person point made on my part.
"this cannot be applied to all circumstances at all"
Have you considered the possibility that there IS a circumstance? that there IS a chain of events occuring to which I have responded, that there IS a problem at hand to which i am referring to? Apparently you've put aside the remote chance that I was being significantly specific when I wrote this, that perhaps I was touching on a subject that only a single reader and I would know of.
"It's thinking like this that prevents progress in society."
It's trying to pick a fight without sturdy reasoning that prevents progress in society. Now don't get me wrong, I love to debate and argue a point or an opinion -- but it comes to a point at which I wonder why you have even bothered giving a shot at it whatsoever with such little rational input on your part.
[and at this point, the conversation is over, and once again, the account closed nonetheless.]
Comments 5
Reply
-mike
Reply
-mike
Reply
you generalize situations dangerously. this cannot be applied to all circumstances at all. it's thinking like this that prevents progress in society.
Reply
"this cannot be applied to all circumstances at all"
Have you considered the possibility that there IS a circumstance? that there IS a chain of events occuring to which I have responded, that there IS a problem at hand to which i am referring to? Apparently you've put aside the remote chance that I was being significantly specific when I wrote this, that perhaps I was touching on a subject that only a single reader and I would know of.
"It's thinking like this that prevents progress in society."
It's trying to pick a fight without sturdy reasoning that prevents progress in society. Now don't get me wrong, I love to debate and argue a point or an opinion -- but it comes to a point at which I wonder why you have even bothered giving a shot at it whatsoever with such little rational input on your part.
[and at this point, the conversation is over, and once again, the account closed nonetheless.]
Reply
Leave a comment