Comments | tenken_the_2nd: Photography website: halp!

tenken_the_2nd

Photography website: halp!

Oct 29, 2011 15:55

This is my actual, experimental portfolio/website/whatever... I didn't announced ou advertised it anywhere yet...
I'm asking for your critics and suggestions!
I do value them: immensely.

Click?

Comments 9

lapswood October 29 2011, 14:59:25 UTC

Nice look. Slide show looked quite pixelated. Could be my phone screen!

tenken_the_2nd October 29 2011, 16:27:18 UTC

You're right!
I changed the animation of the transitions between the images... Maybe it's better this way?

Thank you so much! ♥

lapswood October 29 2011, 18:42:41 UTC

That looks awesome! Much better slideshow.

pax_athena October 29 2011, 15:12:15 UTC

Nice! Nice color combinations and well aranged, everything is easy to find.
But it looks a bit too crowded and the photos - both the slideshows and the whole things - are a bit too small (and I have a small monitors on my 13" laptop, so they might look even smaller on a big one). Or rather, it looks to crowded because the photos, which are the main thing, are rather small.

Btw., I really loved the "conceptual" photos ...

tenken_the_2nd October 29 2011, 16:29:12 UTC

Damn! You are absolutely right! I made them bigger. And eliminated some of the (redundant) text above the slideshow.
Plus, I also had a major mess with the framing of the "portfolio" section, and you made me realize about it.

Thank you so very much! ♥

(The comment has been removed)

tenken_the_2nd October 29 2011, 16:31:48 UTC

Oh... indeed, indeed. The resolution - and maximum size - of the images leave much to desire... I currently don't how how to overcome the issue! Maybe it's the result of being a free account (there are premiums, etc.).

Thank you very much, dear Aquilinum. :3

writingmiles October 30 2011, 01:22:36 UTC

I have always liked it when a person's personal website (like a journal, or facebook page) lists its own URL under "Websites" or "URL".

It looks very good--my only caveat is one that isn't really fixable. Clicking on a button at the bottom has a slight delay before actually having an effect. This is probably just due to the website having to talk to the server before taking an action, so there's not much you can do. Nice work.

tenken_the_2nd October 30 2011, 20:40:09 UTC

I actually listed the url because it is so strange... not really ear-friendly. :) Otherwise, why would people do it? Why do you appreciate the listing?

Oh yes, I know, right? Terribly slow. Maybe the cleverest thing to do is to not use effects at all!

Thank you very, very much! :D

writingmiles October 30 2011, 20:58:56 UTC

I always find it a little funny when a page deliberately links back to itself. Like a little loop into itself.

No, effects are good for this kind of thing: it'd be a little too stark, and the edges and colors ask for a bit more softness. If they could be sped up (the response time, not the actual effecting), they'd be great.