Pointedly said, Ms. Geston. But true nonetheless. And if it weren't, I still would say it were because you frighten me. I kill bitches [who blaspheme Harry Potter].
BUT YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT. You raise up that littled bemittened monkeyfist and you shake it against all that provokes your wrath!
eloquently put, my friend! When you say things like this, people listen. Maybe I should hire you to be my spokesperson for Arrested Development to keep it on the air. I love ye.
I love the books, I just think the fourth movie doesn't do the book justice AT ALL. It was more about looks than substance, and any substance that was tehre was a lot of the times not accurate or just completely made up. I was looking forward to more of Rowling's genious being portrayed than that of the graphic designer's.
ok, that makes me feel much better. I wasn't aware of that, but now that I think about it, it seems to be the only logical thing... I feel stupid now, lol... but I still think some parts should have been included that weren't.
Funny you say that. I really enjoyed that a lot of time wasn't spent on the intricacies of the plot; it just kept going assuming that the audience understood what was happening. In this respect, I thought it followed the book rather well -- because those who have read the book would get it and like it most. A movie for the book fans, not the movie fans. Y'know?
Comments 7
But true nonetheless.
And if it weren't, I still would say it were because you frighten me.
I kill bitches [who blaspheme Harry Potter].
BUT YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT. You raise up that littled bemittened monkeyfist and you shake it against all that provokes your wrath!
Reply
Reply
~Robbie
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment